A Test for the Rational Ignorance Hypothesis: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Brazil
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
vol. 6,
no. 4, November 2014
(pp. 380-98)
Abstract
This paper tests the rational ignorance hypothesis by Downs (1957). This theory predicts that people do not acquire costly information to educate their votes. We provide new estimates for the effect of voting participation by exploring the Brazilian dual voting system- voluntary and compulsory- whose exposure is determined by citizens' date of birth. Using a fuzzy RD approach and data from a self-collected survey, we find no impact of voting on individuals' political knowledge or information consumption. Our results corroborate Downs' predictions and refute the conjecture by Lijphart (1997) that compulsory voting stimulates civic education.Citation
Lopez de Leon, Fernanda Leite, and Renata Rizzi. 2014. "A Test for the Rational Ignorance Hypothesis: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Brazil." American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6 (4): 380-98. DOI: 10.1257/pol.6.4.380Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- O12 Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment