« Back to Results
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, Meeting Room 309
Hosted By:
National Economic Association
We study a salient shock: violent crime. Specifically, we match crime incidents to Chicago Public School (CPS) data to study how potential student exposure to local violent crime during testing periods may affect school-level performance and accountability scores. Chicago is ideal to study this issue with its large school system structured primarily around neighborhood schools. Moreover, its violent crime rate is relatively high, but unevenly distributed across neighborhoods. Hence, students attending demographically similar schools often face different potential violent crime exposure.
Our empirical strategy exploits variation in the timing and location of violent crime to study whether crimes occurring within testing periods near neighborhood schools are negatively related to student test scores and the probability of satisfying accountability standards. Our results suggest exposure to an additional violent event is associated with decreased test performance. The associations are quite local, dying out beyond 0.3 miles from the school. These performance declines are consequential as the schools impacted by within-testing period violent crime are also less likely to meet accountability standards. Overall, our results suggest that violent crime exposure during testing periods may contribute to lower evaluations of schools.
Crime, Education, and Racial Disparities
Paper Session
Friday, Jan. 5, 2018 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM
- Chair: Jevay Grooms, University of Washington
Local Violence, Academic Performance, and School Accountability
Abstract
Inspired by the “No Child Left Behind” legislation, school accountability systems seek to promote school quality improvements and close achievement gaps through increased scrutiny of schools and teachers. Standardized test scores and value-added measures largely determine “grades” assigned to institutions and teachers. Poor evaluations may have severe implications: teachers assigned bad grades may face pay decreases, discipline, and possibly, firing; in some cases, entire schools may be closed or replaced by a charter. Importantly, evaluation depends on within-school factors. However, a growing literature demonstrates that random shocks external to the classroom or school environment may affect measured test performance. As such evaluation systems become increasingly attractive to districts, a more comprehensive understanding is needed of how external stimuli may distort student test performance and, consequently, accountability ratings.We study a salient shock: violent crime. Specifically, we match crime incidents to Chicago Public School (CPS) data to study how potential student exposure to local violent crime during testing periods may affect school-level performance and accountability scores. Chicago is ideal to study this issue with its large school system structured primarily around neighborhood schools. Moreover, its violent crime rate is relatively high, but unevenly distributed across neighborhoods. Hence, students attending demographically similar schools often face different potential violent crime exposure.
Our empirical strategy exploits variation in the timing and location of violent crime to study whether crimes occurring within testing periods near neighborhood schools are negatively related to student test scores and the probability of satisfying accountability standards. Our results suggest exposure to an additional violent event is associated with decreased test performance. The associations are quite local, dying out beyond 0.3 miles from the school. These performance declines are consequential as the schools impacted by within-testing period violent crime are also less likely to meet accountability standards. Overall, our results suggest that violent crime exposure during testing periods may contribute to lower evaluations of schools.
Don’t Shoot! The Impact of Historical African American Protest on Police Killings of Civilians
Abstract
For decades, African Americans have taken to the streets in both peaceful protest and, at times, violent uprisings to express outrage over police killings of African American citizens. However, there exists little empirical evidence as to whether these protests have any impact on the behavior of local police forces. We seek to close this gap by considering the impact of the racial uprisings in the 1960s and 1970s on deaths by legal intervention. A robust event study approach reveals that 60s and 70s era racial uprisings result in increased civilian deaths at the hands of police in subsequent years. In the first three years after a protest in a county, police killings of white Americans increase by 0.66 and killings of non-whites increase by 1.2. In subsequent years, the impact on killings of white Americans disappears while the impact on killings of non-whites persist. These results paint a depressing picture in which local police forces respond to racial unrest through increased killings of largely non-white civilians.Banning the Box: Felony Convictions, Employment Outcomes, and Statistical Discrimination
Abstract
Recent work by Doleac and Hansen (2016) find that Ban-the-Box (BTB) legislation causes a decline in employment of young, low-skilled black and Hispanic men. This study investigates the mechanisms through which well-intentioned policies like BTB, and similar legislation, might hurt the individuals they are meant to help within criminal justice and labor market settings. In particular, this study explores how race and gender influence both criminal justice and labor market outcomes through perceptions of criminality. We contribute to the literature by using an experimental approach to distinguish between statistical and taste-based discrimination, and to determine if trust is a factor influencing racial bias in these settings. To do so, we implement a relatively complex economic lab experiment that incorporates both criminal and hiring decisions through a two-part experiment where participants play an inspection game in the first phase and a gift exchange game in the second phase. In this paper, we focus on the inspection game results in order to understand how race influences racial bias in policing and punishment through the decision to inspect an individual that may or may not have participated in “criminal” activity. Future work will explore how participants’ “criminal” activity, race, and gender interact to influence “hiring” decisions within the gift exchange game played in the second phase of the experiment.Discussant(s)
Alberto Ortega
,
Whitman College
Luisa Blanco
,
Pepperdine University
Bradley L. Hardy
,
American University
Patrick Mason
,
Florida State University
JEL Classifications
- I2 - Education and Research Institutions
- K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior