Login
Register
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Search
EconTrack
About EconSpark
Ask a Question
When and how is it appropriate for a journal editor to retract acceptance of a forthcoming paper?
0
votes
asked
6 years
ago
in
General Economics Questions
by
Eric Rasmusen
(
2.3k
points)
Igor Pak, a mathematician, has written a very detailed and good post on the editorial process, intervention by outsiders, what to do if a fatal flaw is discovered, and so forth. I don't agree with it all, but given the number of issues he addresses concretely, it's statistically highly unlikely anyone will agree with it all. (It's also unlikely anybody will *disagree* with it all, to look on the bright side.) Any comments?
https://igorpak.wordpress.com/2018/09/14/what-weve-got-here-is-failure-to-communicate/#comments
I'd be particularly interested in hearing from academics who think that it is appropriate to retract acceptance of papers that would have pernicious political effects, though that is just part of what Pak addresses. (Politics in math? Yes--- many people apparently think that some theorems, though correct, give aid and comfort to the Alt-Right , shouldn't be accepted, and any mistaken acceptances should be retracted. See
https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/
and the 41 pages of documentary evidence posted a couple of days ago at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lnm3csfna4seavr/hill_redacted.pdf?dl=0
).
journals
retractions
political
correctness
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
0
votes
answered
6 years
ago
by
Antonn_Park
(
410
points)
I'm not sure, but you may have more luck if you ask a journal's managing editor.
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
...