Limits of Arbitrage and Term Structure of Idiosyncratic Risk in the Housing Market
Abstract
Government regulations on housing flippers target their high capital gains but ignore their risk-sharingfunction: rational arbitrageurs reduce systematic risk borne by other participants while undertaking
high idiosyncratic risk themselves. Regulations that tighten the limits of arbitrage in housing markets
can adversely affect market efficiency by blocking this risk-sharing function. Using the comprehensive
housing transaction records in Hong Kong from 1993 to 2021, we find although flippers obtain higher
annual capital gain returns than long-term buyers by 8.76 percentage points, they undertake
substantially higher idiosyncratic risk due to a unique downward term structure of idiosyncratic risk
in real estate markets. Only experienced flippers, who have at least two prior trading experiences and
constitute less than 20% of the flippers, outperform long-term buyers in terms of risk-adjusted returns.
Following the enactment of an anti-speculation policy that decreases the share of flippers by 13.7
percentage points in one year, the systematic risk of the entire housing market increases by 22.3%.