This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Economic Review
  4. May 2016
  5. Experimental Age Discrimination Evidence and the Heckman Critique

American Economic Review

ISSN 0002-8282 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7981 (Online)

Experimental Age Discrimination Evidence and the Heckman Critique

  • David Neumark
  • Ian Burn
  • Patrick Button
American Economic Review
vol. 106, no. 5, May 2016
(pp. 303–08)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

We design and implement a large-scale field experiment on age discrimination to address limitations of past research that may bias their results. One limitation is the practice of giving older and younger applicants similar experience in the job to which they are applying, to make them "otherwise comparable." The second limitation is ignoring the likelihood of greater variation in unobserved differences among older workers owing to human capital investment. Based on evidence from over 40,000 job applications, we find robust evidence of age discrimination in hiring against older women, but considerably less evidence of age discrimination against older men.

Citation

Neumark, David, Ian Burn, and Patrick Button. 2016. "Experimental Age Discrimination Evidence and the Heckman Critique." American Economic Review, 106 (5): 303–08. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20161008

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • C93 Field Experiments
  • J14 Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
  • J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
  • J71 Labor Discrimination