This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives
  4. Spring 2001
  5. The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?

Journal of Economic Perspectives

ISSN 0895-3309 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7965 (Online)

The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?

  • Benjamin Klein
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 15, no. 2, Spring 2001
(pp. 45–62)
Download Full Text PDF
(Complimentary)

Abstract

This paper examines the competitive actions taken by Microsoft in its "browser war" with Netscape, most importantly Microsoft's decisions to give away Explorer free of charge, integrate Explorer into its dominant Windows operating system and pay online service providers for exclusive distribution. Consumers benefited significantly from these actions, but the fundamental economic question is whether Microsoft abused its existing market power when competing in this way. A detailed analysis of Microsoft's conduct and the economics of competition for distribution suggests that severe limits placed on Microsoft's behavior would not be welfare.

Citation

Klein, Benjamin. 2001. "The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2): 45–62. DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.2.45

JEL Classification

  • K21 Antitrust Law
  • L86 Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
  • L51 Economics of Regulation
  • L41 Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment